Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Online Learning under Budget and ROI Constraints via Weak Adaptivity

Authors: Matteo Castiglioni, Andrea Celli, Christian Kroer

ICML 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We prove the first best-of-both-worlds no-regret guarantees which hold in absence of the two aforementioned assumptions, under stochastic and adversarial inputs." and "We show that the resulting framework provides best-of-both-worlds no-regret guarantees while solving both limitations.
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy 2Department of Computing Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy 3IEOR Department, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Primal-dual framework." and "Algorithm 2 Primal regret minimizer.
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any explicit statements or links indicating that source code for the described methodology is publicly available.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not mention the use of specific public datasets for training or evaluation.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical data with training, validation, or test splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not conduct experiments requiring hardware. No hardware specifications are mentioned.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not describe experiments that would require specific software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe empirical experiments with specific setup details like hyperparameters or training configurations.