Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Participatory Budgeting with Donations and Diversity Constraints

Authors: Jiehua Chen, Martin Lackner, Jan Maly9323-9330

AAAI 2022 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical To sum up, our work provides a first axiomatic and computational analysis of PB with donations and diversity constraints, in the form of both upper and lower bounds. We discuss features and pitfalls of this idea, propose methods to handle donations, and analyze their computational demands.
Researcher Affiliation Academia TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Sequential-R(I)
Open Source Code No The paper states, "Due to space limits, most proofs are deferred to (Chen, Lackner, and Maly 2021)," referencing a technical report on arXiv. This is not an explicit statement of releasing source code for the methodology or a direct link to a code repository.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and does not involve experiments with datasets, thus no dataset is mentioned as publicly available or open for training.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve experiments or data splits for training, validation, or testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not describe any experiments that would require hardware specifications.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not describe any experiments that would require software dependencies with specific version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe any empirical experiments or their setup, therefore, no hyperparameters or system-level training settings are provided.