Phragmén Rules for Degressive and Regressive Proportionality

Authors: Michał Jaworski, Piotr Skowron

IJCAI 2022 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We will now analyze, through experiments, how voters satisfaction depends on using committee election rules implementing different types of proportionality. We ran 1000 simulations for each scenario. In Table 1 we give numerical values quantifying the voters satisfaction. From the experiments we conclude:
Researcher Affiliation Academia Michał Jaworski and Piotr Skowron University of Warsaw, Poland {m.jaworski, p.skowron}@mimuw.edu.pl
Pseudocode No The paper describes the rules and procedures in narrative text with examples but does not include structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide explicit statements or links to open-source code for the methodology described.
Open Datasets No The paper describes generating synthetic data from beta distributions rather than using a named, publicly available dataset with concrete access information: 'We draw the individuals independently at random from beta distributions, scaled into [-1, 1].'
Dataset Splits No The paper describes running simulations with generated data but does not specify train/validation/test dataset splits. It states: 'We ran 1000 simulations for each scenario.'
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide any specific details about the hardware used to run the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not specify any software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup Yes In the simulations we consider instances with n = 200 voters, m = 150 candidates and for the committee size k = 25. What is more, we set the acceptance radius τ = 0.2 and the parameters of the probability function pη to: τ = 30, δ = 120.