Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Principal Component Analysis in the Local Differential Privacy Model

Authors: Di Wang, Jinhui Xu

IJCAI 2019 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Experiments on both synthetic and real world datasets con๏ฌrm the theoretical guarantees of our algorithms.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Di Wang , Jinhui Xu Department of Computer Science and Engineering State University of New York at Bu๏ฌ€alo, NY, USA. {dwang45,jinhui}@bu๏ฌ€alo.edu.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Local Gaussian Mechanism and Algorithm 2 Local Gaussian Mechanism-High Dimension
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any explicit statements about making the source code available or links to a code repository.
Open Datasets Yes For real world datasets, we run Algorithm 1 on Covertype and Buzz datasets [Dheeru and Karra Taniskidou, 2017] with normalized rows for each dataset. ... UCI machine learning repository, 2017.
Dataset Splits No The paper does not explicitly provide details about training, validation, or testing splits for the datasets used in the experiments.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory) used to conduct the experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific software dependencies or version numbers for any libraries, frameworks, or programming languages used in the experiments.
Experiment Setup Yes We choose ํ‘›= 105, ํ‘= 40, ํ‘˜= {5, 10, 15, 20}, ํœ–= 0.5, ํ›ฟ= 10 4, and ํœ†= 1. ... We set ํ‘˜= 10, ํ‘›= 2000, ํ‘= 400, ํ‘ = {15, 20, 40, 80} and ํœ–= 1.