Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in [1].

Robust Survey Aggregation with Student-t Distribution and Sparse Representation

Authors: Qingtao Tang, Tao Dai, Li Niu, Yisen Wang, Shu-Tao Xia, Jianfei Cai

IJCAI 2017 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method achieves significant improvement over the state-of-the-art methods on both synthetic and real datasets.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, China EMAIL; EMAIL School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore EMAIL; EMAIL
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain STRUCTURED PSEUDOCODE OR ALGORITHM BLOCKS (clearly labeled algorithm sections or code-like formatted procedures).
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide CONCRETE ACCESS TO SOURCE CODE (specific repository link, explicit code release statement, or code in supplementary materials) for the methodology described in this paper.
Open Datasets Yes GSS. General Social Survey (GSS) is a well-known public survey dataset [Smith et al., 2015].
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions varying 'sampling percentage from 3% to 30%' but does not provide SPECIFIC DATASET SPLIT INFORMATION (exact percentages, sample counts, citations to predefined splits, or detailed splitting methodology) needed to reproduce the data partitioning.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide SPECIFIC HARDWARE DETAILS (exact GPU/CPU models, processor types with speeds, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) used for running its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide SPECIFIC ANCILLARY SOFTWARE DETAILS (e.g., library or solver names with version numbers like Python 3.8, CPLEX 12.4) needed to replicate the experiment.
Experiment Setup No The paper mentions varying 'sampling percentage from 3% to 30%' but does not contain SPECIFIC EXPERIMENTAL SETUP DETAILS (concrete hyperparameter values, training configurations, or system-level settings) in the main text.