Notice: The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates. Full accuracy metrics and methodology are described in Coakley et alK. L. Coakley, T. Snelleman, H. Hoos, and O. E. Gundersen, "The embrace of open science: An analysis of a decade of AI research and 56 800 conference papers," Under Review, 2026..
Temporal Planning with Temporal Metric Trajectory Constraints
Authors: Andrea Micheli, Enrico Scala7675-7682
AAAI 2019 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | Our experiments prove the proposed framework superior to alternative state-of-the-art planning approaches on industrial benchmarks, and competitive with similar solving methods on well known benchmarks took from the planning competition. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | Andrea Micheli Fondazione Bruno Kessler Trento, 38123, Italy EMAIL Enrico Scala Fondazione Bruno Kessler Trento, 38123, Italy EMAIL |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1 EAGER-SEARCH Successor Function |
| Open Source Code | Yes | TPACK and the benchmark instances are available at http://es.fbk.eu/people/amicheli/resources/aaai19. |
| Open Datasets | Yes | TPACK and the benchmark instances are available at http://es.fbk.eu/people/amicheli/resources/aaai19. We took 6 domains from the IPC-14 competition (Vallati, Chrpa, and Mc Cluskey 2018), choosing those where a problem generator was available. |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper describes the instances used for evaluation (e.g., number of items, jobs, domains from IPC-14) but does not provide explicit training/validation/test dataset splits or methodologies for creating such splits. |
| Hardware Specification | Yes | We ran all the experiments on a Xeon E5-2620 2.10GHz with 1800s/15GB of time/memory limits. |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper mentions specific planners used (ENHSP, ITSAT, TFD, OPTIC) but does not provide their version numbers or any other software dependencies with version specifications. |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | All configurations ran using a best-first-search with f(s) = g(s) + 4 h(s) where the g-value is the length of the prefix. |