Two Sides of the Same Coin: Belief Revision and Enforcing Arguments
Authors: Adrian Haret, Johannes P. Wallner, Stefan Woltran
IJCAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Theoretical | Our analysis of enforcing arguments proceeds by (i) axiomatizing it as an operation in propositional logic and providing a representation result in terms of rankings on sets of interpretations, (ii) showing that it stands in close relationship to belief revision, and (iii) using it as a gateway towards a principled treatment of enforcement in abstract argumentation. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | Adrian Haret, Johannes P. Wallner, and Stefan Woltran Institute of Logic and Computation, TU Wien, Austria |
| Pseudocode | No | The paper does not contain structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks. |
| Open Source Code | No | The paper does not provide concrete access to source code for the methodology described. |
| Open Datasets | No | The paper is theoretical and does not use datasets; therefore, no information on public dataset access is provided. |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper is theoretical and does not involve dataset splits for experiments. |
| Hardware Specification | No | The paper is theoretical and does not describe experiments that would require hardware specifications. |
| Software Dependencies | No | The paper is theoretical and does not specify software dependencies with version numbers for reproducibility of experiments. |
| Experiment Setup | No | The paper is theoretical and does not provide details on an experimental setup, hyperparameters, or training configurations. |