Weighted Voting Via No-Regret Learning

Authors: Nika Haghtalab, Ritesh Noothigattu, Ariel Procaccia

AAAI 2018 | Conference PDF | Archive PDF | Plain Text | LLM Run Details

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We derive possibility and impossibility results for the existence of such weighting schemes, depending on whether the voting rule and the weighting scheme are deterministic or randomized, as well as on the social choice axioms satisfied by the voting rule.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Nika Haghtalab Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 nhaghtal@cs.cmu.edu Ritesh Noothigattu Machine Learning Department Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 riteshn@cmu.edu Ariel D. Procaccia Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 arielpro@cs.cmu.edu
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Full information setting, using randomized weights. ... Algorithm 2: Partial information setting, using randomized weights.
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide any information or links regarding the availability of its source code.
Open Datasets No The paper is theoretical and focuses on mathematical derivations and algorithm design; it does not describe the use of any datasets for training.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not involve empirical validation on datasets, thus no mention of validation splits is made.
Hardware Specification No The paper is theoretical and does not describe any empirical experiments, thus no hardware specifications are mentioned.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not describe an implementation or empirical experiments that would require specific software dependencies with version numbers.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe an experimental setup with hyperparameters or system-level training settings.